-
Volume 69, March 2023 - current issue
-
Vol 27, September 2019
-
Vol 26, August 2019
-
Vol 25, July 2019
-
Vol 24, June 2019
-
Vol 23, May 2019
-
Vol 22, April 2019
-
Vol 21, March 2019
-
Vol 20, February 2019
-
Vol 19, January 2019
-
Vol 18, December 2018
-
Vol 17, November 2018
-
Vol 16, October 2018
-
Vol 15, September 2018
-
Vol 14, August 2018
-
Vol 13, July 2018
-
Vol 12, June 2018
-
Vol 11, May 2018
-
Vol 10, April 2018
-
Vol 9, March 2018
-
Vol 8, February 2018
-
Vol 7, January 2018
-
Vol 6 No 12, December 2017
-
Vol 6 No 11, November 2017
-
Vol 6 No 10, October 2017
-
Vol 6 No 9, September 2017
-
Vol 6 No 8, August 2017
-
Vol 6 No 7, July 2017
-
Vol 6 No 6, June 2017
-
Vol 6 No 5, May 2017
-
Vol 6 No 4, April 2017
-
Vol 6 No 3, March 2017
-
Vol 6 No 2, February 2017
-
Vol 6 No 1, January 2017
-
Vol 5 No 12, December 2016
-
Vol 5 No 11, November 2016
-
Vol 5 No 10, October 2016
-
Vol 5 No 9, September 2016
-
Vol 5 No 8, August 2016
-
Vol 5 No 7, July 2016
-
Vol 5 No 6, June 2016
-
Vol 5 No 5, May 2016
-
Vol 5 No 4, April 2016
-
Vol 5 No 3, March 2016
-
Vol 5 No 2, February 2016
-
Vol 5 No 1, January 2016
-
Vol 4 No 12, December 2015
-
Vol 4 No 11, November 2015
-
Vol 4 No 10, October 2015
Cover Story Current Issue

Consuming small amounts of palatable food, i.e., snacking, at various times of the day is a highly prevalent behavior in most modern societies. Chronic rest-phase food intake – especially of high-caloric items – promotes obesity and disrupts endogenous circadian rhythms. Notably, humans and mice are more prone to hedonically driven eating behavior, the overconsumption of palatable food, during the late active/early inactive phase, i.e., the morning in mice, the evening in humans. While the effects of calorie-dense food items in promoting body weight gain are well documented, the metabolic impact of snack timing is far less understood.
Kimberly Begemann, Isabel Heyde, Pia Witt, Julica Inderhees, ... Henrik Oster
Current Issue
Sex differences in islet stress responses support female β cell resilience
Objective
Pancreatic β cells play a key role in maintaining glucose homeostasis; dysfunction of this critical cell type causes type 2 diabetes (T2D). Emerging evidence points to sex differences in β cells, but few studies have examined male-female differences in β cell stress responses and resilience across multiple contexts, including diabetes. Here, we address the need for high-quality information on sex differences in β cell and islet gene expression and function using both human and rodent samples.
Methods
In humans, we compared β cell gene expression and insulin secretion in donors with T2D to non-diabetic donors in both males and females. In mice, we generated a well-powered islet RNAseq dataset from 20-week-old male and female siblings with similar insulin sensitivity. Our unbiased gene expression analysis pointed to a sex difference in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response. Based on this analysis, we hypothesized female islets would be more resilient to ER stress than male islets. To test this, we subjected islets isolated from age-matched male and female mice to thapsigargin treatment and monitored protein synthesis, cell death, and β cell insulin production and secretion. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses were used to characterize sex differences in islet responses to ER stress.
Results
Our single-cell analysis of human β cells revealed sex-specific changes to gene expression and function in T2D, correlating with more robust insulin secretion in human islets isolated from female donors with T2D compared to male donors with T2D. In mice, RNA sequencing revealed differential enrichment of unfolded protein response pathway-associated genes, where female islets showed higher expression of genes linked with protein synthesis, folding, and processing. This differential expression was physiologically significant, as islets isolated from female mice were more resilient to ER stress induction with thapsigargin. Specifically, female islets showed a greater ability to maintain glucose-stimulated insulin production and secretion during ER stress compared with males.
Conclusions
Our data demonstrate sex differences in β cell gene expression in both humans and mice, and that female β cells show a greater ability to maintain glucose-stimulated insulin secretion across multiple physiological and pathological contexts.
Sex differences in islet stress responses support female β cell resilience
Objective
Pancreatic β cells play a key role in maintaining glucose homeostasis; dysfunction of this critical cell type causes type 2 diabetes (T2D). Emerging evidence points to sex differences in β cells, but few studies have examined male-female differences in β cell stress responses and resilience across multiple contexts, including diabetes. Here, we address the need for high-quality information on sex differences in β cell and islet gene expression and function using both human and rodent samples.
Methods
In humans, we compared β cell gene expression and insulin secretion in donors with T2D to non-diabetic donors in both males and females. In mice, we generated a well-powered islet RNAseq dataset from 20-week-old male and female siblings with similar insulin sensitivity. Our unbiased gene expression analysis pointed to a sex difference in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response. Based on this analysis, we hypothesized female islets would be more resilient to ER stress than male islets. To test this, we subjected islets isolated from age-matched male and female mice to thapsigargin treatment and monitored protein synthesis, cell death, and β cell insulin production and secretion. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses were used to characterize sex differences in islet responses to ER stress.
Results
Our single-cell analysis of human β cells revealed sex-specific changes to gene expression and function in T2D, correlating with more robust insulin secretion in human islets isolated from female donors with T2D compared to male donors with T2D. In mice, RNA sequencing revealed differential enrichment of unfolded protein response pathway-associated genes, where female islets showed higher expression of genes linked with protein synthesis, folding, and processing. This differential expression was physiologically significant, as islets isolated from female mice were more resilient to ER stress induction with thapsigargin. Specifically, female islets showed a greater ability to maintain glucose-stimulated insulin production and secretion during ER stress compared with males.
Conclusions
Our data demonstrate sex differences in β cell gene expression in both humans and mice, and that female β cells show a greater ability to maintain glucose-stimulated insulin secretion across multiple physiological and pathological contexts.
2021 impact factor: 8.568
Here is a video of Vimeo. When the iframes is activated, a connection to Vimeo is established and, if necessary, cookies from Vimeo are also used. For further information on cookies policy click here.