Cover Story Current Issue

Postpartum (PP) maternal mortality remains alarmingly high, with a rate of 32.9 per 100,000 live births in 2021 in the United States. Cardiovascular diseases, including peripartum/postpartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) and coronary heart disease, are among the leading causes of PP morbidity and mortality. Although socioeconomic status and the level of PP care can influence the mortality rate, the underlying mechanisms leading to PPCM are not well understood. PPCM is clinically defined as (1) the development of the disease in the last month of pregnancy or within 5 months of delivery, (2) absence of pre-existing heart disease prior to the last month of pregnancy, (3) unknown cause of heart failure, and (4) left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Prognosis remains poor, with full recovery reported in only 23% of affected individuals and 50% experiencing heart failure-related mortality due to limited therapeutic options. Limited studies in both humans and mouse models of PPCM have proposed several potential mechanisms, including inflammation, viral myocarditis, autoimmune reactions, oxidative stress, and apoptosis, resulting from environmental as well as genetic factors. Studying these mechanisms in animal models, particularly those involving genetic causes, has been difficult due to the lack of severity or relevance of existing mouse models of PPCM to the human disease.

Full text

 

Current Issue

No UCP1 in the kidney

Celso Pereira Batista Sousa-Filho, Natasa Petrovic

No UCP1 in the kidney

 

Objectives

Several recent studies have indicated the presence of UCP1 in the kidney, challenging the paradigm that UCP1 is only found in brown and beige adipocytes and broadening the (patho)physiological significance of UCP1. The kidney localization has been the direct result of immunohistochemical investigations and an inferred outcome from multiple lines of reporter mice. These findings require confirmation and further physiological characterization.

Methods

We examined UCP1 expression in the kidney using immunohistochemistry and qPCR. Transversal sections through or near the kidney hilum, consistently including perirenal brown fat and adjacent kidney tissue, were analyzed with four UCP1 antibodies.

Results

In addition to detecting UCP1 in perirenal adipose tissue, we observed distinct immunopositive structures in the kidney with our in-house UCP1-antibody, ‘C10’, in apparent agreement with earlier reports. To corroborate this, we tested the C10-antibody on kidney sections from UCP1-ablated mice but found equal reactivity in these UCP1-negative tissues. We then tested the widely used antibody ab10983, previously employed in kidney studies. Also here, the positive signal persisted in UCP1-ablated mice, clearly invalidating earlier findings. UCP1 qPCR studies also failed to detect UCP1 mRNA above background. Finally, two highly specific antibodies, E9Z2V and EPR20381, accurately detected UCP1 in perirenal adipose tissue but showed no signal in the kidney.

Conclusions

When appropriate controls are implemented, there is no evidence for the presence of UCP1 in the kidney. Consequently, this conclusion also implies that the results from UCP1 reporter mice, specifically regarding kidney expression of the UCP1 gene – though possibly applicable to other tissues – require reconfirmation before being accepted as evidence for the presence of UCP1 in non-adipose tissues.

 

Articles in Press

No UCP1 in the kidney

Celso Pereira Batista Sousa-Filho, Natasa Petrovic

No UCP1 in the kidney

 

Objectives

Several recent studies have indicated the presence of UCP1 in the kidney, challenging the paradigm that UCP1 is only found in brown and beige adipocytes and broadening the (patho)physiological significance of UCP1. The kidney localization has been the direct result of immunohistochemical investigations and an inferred outcome from multiple lines of reporter mice. These findings require confirmation and further physiological characterization.

Methods

We examined UCP1 expression in the kidney using immunohistochemistry and qPCR. Transversal sections through or near the kidney hilum, consistently including perirenal brown fat and adjacent kidney tissue, were analyzed with four UCP1 antibodies.

Results

In addition to detecting UCP1 in perirenal adipose tissue, we observed distinct immunopositive structures in the kidney with our in-house UCP1-antibody, ‘C10’, in apparent agreement with earlier reports. To corroborate this, we tested the C10-antibody on kidney sections from UCP1-ablated mice but found equal reactivity in these UCP1-negative tissues. We then tested the widely used antibody ab10983, previously employed in kidney studies. Also here, the positive signal persisted in UCP1-ablated mice, clearly invalidating earlier findings. UCP1 qPCR studies also failed to detect UCP1 mRNA above background. Finally, two highly specific antibodies, E9Z2V and EPR20381, accurately detected UCP1 in perirenal adipose tissue but showed no signal in the kidney.

Conclusions

When appropriate controls are implemented, there is no evidence for the presence of UCP1 in the kidney. Consequently, this conclusion also implies that the results from UCP1 reporter mice, specifically regarding kidney expression of the UCP1 gene – though possibly applicable to other tissues – require reconfirmation before being accepted as evidence for the presence of UCP1 in non-adipose tissues.

 

CHECK OUT PROGRAM!

13th
Helmholtz Diabetes Conference 

Munich, 21-23. Sep 2026                                                                                                                             

2024 impact factor: 6.6

You are what you eat

Here is a video of Vimeo. When the iframes is activated, a connection to Vimeo is established and, if necessary, cookies from Vimeo are also used. For further information on cookies policy click here.

Auf Werbeinhalte, die vor, während oder nach Videos von WEBSITE-URL eingeblendet werden, hat WEBSITE-URL keinen Einfluss. Wir übernehmen keine Gewähr für diese Inhalte. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier.